臺灣能源期刊發行
- 創刊日期：
102年11月30日
- 發行所：
經濟部能源署
- 發行人：
游振偉
- 地址：
台北市復興北路2號13樓
- 電話：
02-2772-1370
- 執行單位：
財團法人工業技術研究院
- 地址：
新竹縣竹東鎮中興路四段195號26館
- 服務專線：
03-5916006
- 服務信箱：
- 總編輯：
王漢英胡均立
- 顧問：
王運銘童遷祥王人謙
- 執行主編：
劉子衙陳志臣
- 編輯委員：
方良吉王錫福朱家齊李堅明李叢禎林師模馬鴻文陳希立廖芳玲廖肇寧劉文獻蕭志同顧洋(依筆畫順序排列)
:::
臺灣能源期刊論文全文
臺灣能源期刊第2卷第3期內容
出刊日期：September, 2015
- 題目
- 合作社模式應用於臺灣社區風電可行及其推動策略研究
- Title
- Driven Feasibility and Strategic of Cooperative for the Community Wind Power in Taiwan
- 作者
- 張鼎煥、陳冠宇、李方琪、徐傑輝、胡斯遠、呂威賢
- Authors
- Ting-Huan Chang, Kuan-Yu Chen, Fang-Chi Lee, Chieh-Hui Hsu, Ssu-Yuan Hu, Wei-Hsien Lu,
- 摘要
- 臺灣地狹人綢以致風力資源開發易因低頻噪音、葉片炫影或公安意外等造成鄰避問題，社區風電乃經由當地居民參與解決鄰避問題可能引發的抗爭。本文定義社區風電係由風力開發業者、社區居民及其利害關係人合資或由社區居民及其利害關係人獨資之電業，研究發現採合作社模式始得限制股份轉讓鎖定社區居民及其利害關係人長期共利關係，惟風力開發業者如屬營利性質，不得為合作社社員，得以委託營運方式參與社區風電。此外，因合作社模式期間投資報酬較公司模式低，故建議政府推動社區風電宜提高財務誘因、加強宣導推廣、提供行政支援與增加融資管道，亦給予土地所有權或按鄰避距離不同權益比例較能鼓勵參與。此外，本文雖建議臺灣社區風電採合作社模式推廣，但推廣初期毋論公司模式或合作社模式皆有助風力發電市場多元化參與，公司模式如由風力開發業者發起募資參與社區風電，則建議發行債務憑證由社區居民及其利害關係人認購獲得固定收益之報酬方式較佳。本研究成果除做為臺灣社區風電推動可行及其推動策略參考，另得應用於離岸風力發電漁業權補償機制，擴及其他再生能源。
- 關鍵字
- 再生能源、風力、社區風電、合作社、財務評估
- Abatract
- Taiwan is a narrow land with a high population density. Development of wind resources easily incurs not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) objections because of low-frequency noise, shadow flickers, and public safety accidents. Community wind power can address possible conflicts resulting from NIMBY through local resident participation. In this study, community wind power was defined as joint-venture electricity companies among wind power developers, community residents, stakeholders, and sole proprietorship by community residents and stakeholders. Research has shown that adopting a cooperative model limits the transfer of shares and maintains a long-term mutually beneficial relationship between community residents and stakeholders. Wind power developers who operate businesses for profit cannot be members of a cooperative society; however, these developers can participate in community wind power through contracted operations. In addition, because the rate of return of the cooperative model is lower than that of the corporate model, this study suggested that governments promoting community wind power should increase financial incentives, enhance promotional propaganda, provide administrative support, increase financial channels, and provide land ownership or offer equity ratios according to the NIMBY distance to encourage resident participation. Moreover, although the cooperative model was a recommended model for Taiwanese community wind power, both the corporate and cooperative models helped diversify participation in wind power markets. If in a corporate model, wind power developers raise funds as a method to participate in community wind power, they should issue debt obligations that community residents and stakeholders can invest to obtain constant returns. The results of this study can be used as references for promoting community wind power in Taiwan and relevant strategies. In addition, the results can be applied to an offshore wind power compensation mechanism for fishing rights and be extended to other renewable energy sources.
- Keywords
- Renewable energy, Wind power, Community wind farm, Cooperative, Financial assessment